This column is a follow-up to my last one (September/October), which you can check out on our website if you wish. The basic message of the previous column was that the social movement in which we are all participating – sometimes called the Good Food Movement – benefits greatly from its diversity, but faces great adversity if we cannot overcome internal fragmentation. In this column I wish to take that theme a step farther in being more specific.
There are many different attributes that can be and have been assigned to food to make it more interesting to consumers and, at the same time, more profitable for farmers to produce. We seem to be coming up with new ones all the time, some of which are based on credible criteria and others less so. But the “big three,” if you will, are organic, sustainable and local, which have been developed over the years in approximately that same chronological order, at least in the perceptions of consumers. Continue reading
A Sustainable Agriculture Perspective on Food Safety
Released: November 8, 2010
What makes food safe? Or, for that matter, nutritious, or enjoyable? Such questions acknowledge the many inherent risks that compromise the availability, diversity, quality, wholesomeness, cleanliness, and affordability of food, making it less safe, secure, or sustainable.
We enter this conversation as partners in the rapidly growing constituency of local and regional food systems across the United States. We are farmers and food-related business of many shapes and sizes, committed to providing the safest food possible without increasing the potential for adverse unintended consequences. We see ‘food safety’ in the context of many other risks to our shared food systems.
As citizens and as stakeholders, our commitment to food safety is informed by our concerns about:
- The long-term loss of topsoil, species diversity, natural resources, opportunity for farms and rural communities, and choices for consumers
- The public health consequences of industrial chemical and pharmaceutical use on and off farms
- The long-term effects of implementing inadequately tested and controlled technology
- The concentration of wealth, power, and control of production in the hands of fewer and fewer players in the food system
- Private ownership and patenting of seeds and other production technologies
- A widening gap in the connection between many citizens and the sources of their food
- Instances in which farmers are disregarded or demonized, in particular by other farmers
- The measurable but unpredictable impacts of the industrial model applied to agriculture Continue reading